/internet-infidels-articles/page/35/

Some Thoughts on Evolutionary Theory

Scientific theories need not be judged by evidence alone. In this piece, I defend Natural Selection and criticise Intelligent Design and Strict Creationism as scientific theories using an alternative to purely evidential claims.

How Church People Think

A recent column by Eugene Kane depicts how "church people think," and suggests that atheists suffer by comparison.

The Creationist Holy War

If creationism, which often masquerades as "Intelligent Design" (ID), becomes standard classroom fare, both science and Christianity have much to lose.

A Supposedly Fatal Bee Sting

Intelligent Design is essentially a Trojan Horse for creationists. By claiming that organisms were simply too complex to have evolved, they can try to make their case for creation "science". Intelligent Design, although it sounds valid, is in fact flawed. This article explains why.

The Power of the F-Word: Fiction in Service of the Secular

Fiction gets into the hands of people who would otherwise be unreceptive to rational critiques of God and faith. And it gets into more than their hands. In many ways fiction is the more effective route into the human mind because it speaks not just in syllogisms but in the language of experience.

Poisoning the Well

The public debate about Newdow v. U.S. Congress is of very low quality. Politicians, the media, columnists, and the public all seem to either have severe misunderstandings of the issues involved, or worse, appear to deliberately twist the facts. Until the public debate becomes more rational, we cannot hope to have anything good come out of it.

Sword of Islam: Muslim Extremists from the Arab Conquests to the Attack on America

Sword of Islam: Muslim Extremists from the Arab Conquests to the Attack on America
Amazon

Undoubtedly timely and full of fascinating detail, Sword of Islam is a thorough, well-researched, and revealing account of global Islamic terrorism. A military historian, John F. Murphy Jr. traces the intricate interconnections among various terrorist cells, including Osama Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda and its relationship with the Taliban of Afghanistan, the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Islamic […]

On Arrogance

A thoughtful and fascinating look at the recent Pledge decision from the point of view of a Canadian who hopes that the people and the courts of the United States will do what they know is right: uphold their own laws on this matter.

That Old Fool of Psalm 14

Blowhards frequently repeat the biblical quotation that only a fool denies the existence of God. But is the quote really talking about atheists?

The Rest of the Story

Updated: June 4, 2002 The following book review is a revised version of the original review published in Philo 2 (1999), pp. 89-102. Review of Lee Strobel The Case for Christ: A Journalist’s Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998. Lee Strobel, an ex-investigative reporter for the Chicago Tribune who […]

Creationism to Universal Darwinism: Evolution and Religion

A short taste of the long-standing argument between religionists and evolutionists, where it has been, and where it is going. As Edis puts it, "Today, more than a century after Darwin convinced biologists that life had evolved, we still see a raging controversy over creation and evolution. Together with this, we have a large range of ideas about what evolution means for religion."

Does the Claim of Jesus’ Resurrection Prevail Under the Federal Rules of Evidence?

Edward Tabash, a constitutional and civil rights attorney, critically analyzes Faith on Trial by attorney Pamela Binnings Ewen. Whereas Ewen attempts to show that a trial conducted under the Federal Rules of Evidence would uphold the claim that Jesus was supernaturally resurrected following his execution, Tabash argues that the so-called evidence of Jesus' supernatural resurrection would not even be admitted into evidence, thus the jury would not even get to hear it--let alone decide if it were true.

A Mixed Bag For Free Speech

The United States Supreme Court upholds a non-key provision of the Children's On-Line Protection Act (COPA), but sends it back to lower courts for consideration of other challenges. Meanwhile, the latest censorship attempt by Congress, the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), was struck down by a special 3-judge trial court. Next stop: the Supreme Court. Still, free speech advocates must worry at this continuous stream of censorship laws, all merely awaiting a change in the current majority favoring continued free speech on the Internet.

Osama bin Eternal

Peshawar, Pakistan, there’s no place like it anywhere else, that’s for damned sure. (Short story)