You can dismiss the support request pop up for 4 weeks (28 days) if you want to be reminded again. Or you can dismiss until our next donations drive (typically at the beginning of October). Before you dismiss, please consider making a donation. Thanks!
One Time
 $5/month (US)
 $10/month (US)
 Support II via AmazonSmile Internet Infidels Needs Your Support!
dismiss for   28 days   1 year   info
Welcome!

The Secular Web is owned and operated by Internet Infidels Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization dedicated to promoting and defending a naturalistic worldview on the Internet.

As defined by Paul Draper, naturalism is "the hypothesis that the natural world is a closed system, which means that nothing that is not a part of the natural world affects it." Thus, "naturalism implies that there are no supernatural entities"—including God.
Gather around the Kiosk for thought-provoking articles, informal essays, reviews, humor, satire, fiction, opinions, and fascinating memes.
Kiosk
Browse the Secular Web Library, the worlds largest online collection of literature on the philosophy of religion, religions skepticism, and atheism where you will find defenses of the naturalistic worldview and critiques of religion.
Library
Explore the Secular Web...
Library
Kiosk
Quotation of the Minute
"When we describe something as a random process or an event as occurring by chance, there are two very different things that we may have in mind. ...[One such concept of chance applies to processes] that are apparently random, but have a deterministic basis. ... The process is apparently random because we are ignorant of at least part of the deterministic basis. We use words like chance and random to indicate our ignorance. "We should separate apparently random processes from irreducibly random processes. An irreducibly random process is one that has no deterministic basis. That is, for an irreducibly random process, there is no set of laws of nature that can be applied to a complete description of the initial state of the system to permit the deduction of a description of the outcome. Philip Kitcher, Abusing Science (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982), p. 86.