Home » What’s New on the Secular Web? » What’s New Archive

What’s New Archive

What's New Archive2013March

What's New on the Secular Web?


See Also:
| The News Wire | Best of the Library | Featured Books | Kiosk Editor's Choice |

March 31, 2013

Added The Argument from the Existence of Nondeities (2013) by Horia
to the Logical Arguments for Atheism page under Arguments for Atheism in the Modern Documents section of the Secular Web Library.

In this paper Horia Plugaru argues that if the traditional theistic God were to exist, then there are strong reasons to think that there would exist only deities. If the argument succeeds, then God would have no rational grounds for creating our present world, which contains nondeities. But since the present world clearly exists, it follows that God does not exist. After offering a formal presentation of the argument, Plugaru defends its crucial first premise before responding to five potential objections to the argument.

March 26, 2013

Resurrected from the past (not new, but appropriate for the season): Easter Quiz (2008) by Donald Morgan

Think you know the details regarding the New Testament Empty Tomb and Resurrection stories? Check your knowledge with this short, twenty-two question quiz. The answers may surprise you! You will likely find that the details are so inconsistent from one biblical source to the next that the picture that we are typically given of the events surrounding the alleged Resurrection is necessarily a composite of carefully selected verses which exclude other verses where the details differ.

March 18, 2013

New in the Kiosk: Baseball and the Fine Tuning Argument (2013) by James R. Henderson

Robin Collins argues for the existence of god based on the alleged fine tuning of the universe for life. To do so, he invokes the "Prime Principle of Confirmation." This principle is necessarily broad so that Collins may smuggle in supernatural agency as an explanation of the organized complexity of the universe, but it is so broad that all manner of completely implausible theories are deemed "supported by evidence." Further, the principle may be used to undercut parts of Collins' own argument.

See "What's New?" for past months and years.