You can dismiss the support request pop up for 4 weeks (28 days) if you want to be reminded again. Or you can dismiss until our next donations drive (typically at the beginning of October). Before you dismiss, please consider making a donation. Thanks!
One Time
$5/month (US)
$10/month (US)
Support II via AmazonSmile Internet Infidels Needs Your Support!
dismiss for   28 days   1 year   info
2017 Internet Infidels Fundraising Drive / $32,582.64 of $40,000.00
Support Us! By providing information which is nearly impossible to find elsewhere, the Secular Web has sought to level the playing field by offering arguments and evidence challenging supernatural beliefs. In an ocean of religious confusion, help us maintain a drop of sanity!
81.46%
 

James Hannam

 

Author Bio ]


In Defense of the Fine Tuning Design Argument (2001)

James Hannam argues that atheists have yet to refute the fine tuning argument to design, and therefore we may have reason to believe there was a divine creator.

Response to James Hannam's "In Defense of the Fine Tuning Design Argument" (2001) by Richard Carrier

Response to James Hannam's defense of the fine tuning argument for a Creator. Lists and discusses several sweeping problems with even carefully stated versions of the argument, such as Hannam's.

Objection Dismissed on Appeal (2006)

Though Kyle J. Gerkin's critique of Lee Strobel's The Case for Faith has a great deal to recommend it, and probably even represents the conventional wisdom in skeptical circles, his reply to objection #7 contains a number of factual errors. While earlier historians would have agreed with many of Gerkin's points, current research in the history of science and religion that has yet to percolate into the public consciousness casts doubt upon much of what he says. In this essay Hannam outlines Gerkin's various errors of fact, distinguishing his own views from the relatively uncontroversial conclusions of historians.


Top
Support Us