Home » Library » Historical Library » Joseph Wheless Is It Gods Word Chapter 17

Historical Library Disclaimer

The Historical Library contains writings written before 1970, only. For material written during or after 1970, please refer to the Modern Documents section of the Secular Web Library.

This Historical Library is provided for those doing research into the history of nontheism. It is not intended to be--and should not be used as--a source of modern, up-to-date information regarding atheistic issues. Those looking for modern critiques of theism should go to the Modern Documents section of the Secular Web Library.

All of the Historical Library authors are dead--and in many cases have been so for several decades. We will not reply to email addressed to dead authors, and therefore any email addressed to these authors will be ignored. Similarly, we do not reply to feedback regarding faulty scholarship on the part of dead authors, nor do we correct spelling errors and/or typographical errors (most of which result from the scanning and OCR process) in their articles.
This document has been made available by the Bank of Wisdom.

Joseph Wheless Is It Gods Word Chapter 17

Chapter 17

Joseph Wheless

13 page printout, page 377 - 389



"Redemption from the Curse"

THE whole philosophy of what is fondly known as the "Sacred
science of Christianity" revolves around two extremes of inspired
Bible history: the "curse on man" through Adam, and the "redemption
from the curse" through Jesus Christ. The second Council of Orange
(A.D. 529) thus declares and defines the deadly dogma: "One man
[Adam] has transmitted to the whole human race not only the death
of the body, which is the punishment of sin, but even sin itself,
which is the death of the soul" (Cath. Encyc., Vol. XI, p. 314.)
St. Augustine, profoundest apologist of the Church and its dogmas,
states the Christian scheme thus: "The whole Christian religion may
be summed up in the intervention of two men, the one to ruin us,
the other to save us" (De Pecc. Orig., xxiv; Cath. Encyc., Vol XI,
p. 314). This is but a paraphrase of the proposition as formulated
by the directly inspired originator of the dogma, St. Paul, who
states it very explicitly:

"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be
made alive." (1 Cor. xv, 22)

Thus, by the express utterance of inspiration, the Christian
religion rests totally upon, is inextricably and fatally involved
with, the historicity of the Garden of Eden, of Adam and Eve, of
the talking snake, and of the "curse" and the "Fall" -- for upon
the verity of these events depends utterly the validity of the
divine mission of Jesus Christ, Son of Yahveh God, sent by Yahveh
to "redeem the world from the sin of Adam." It was the "original
sin" of Adam which brought on the fearful curse of Yahveh which
clings to every since-born human soul, until and unless "redeemed"
by Jesus the Christ.

This frightful sin was thus defined by inspiration of the Holy
Ghost in the sacred council of Trent (the italics are mine):
"Original sin is described not only as the death of the soul, but
as the privation of justice that each child contracts at its
conception" (Coun. Trent, Sess. vi, chap. iii; Cath. Encyc., Vol.
XI, p. 314). If this, in the mercies of a just God, is not true, it
is the most fearful and blasting untruth which priest has ever
inflicted on mankind. Let us examine the dogma with the fearful
attention which it challenges.

Inevitably, if Genesis is not true, Jesus Christ, as God and
"Savior," is not, cannot be, true; both stand or fall together; if
one, then the other must be relegated to the same limbo of exploded
myth. Adam, says Paul, "is the figure of him that was to come"
(Rom. v, 15); Jesus Christ, again he says, is the "last Adam" (I
Cor. xv, 45). If the "first Adam" goes into the discard, the "last
Adam" must needs follow.

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


In a previous chapter we have examined a score or more of
pretended "prophecies" of the Hebrew Scriptures, alleged to have
been "fulfilled" in Jesus Christ and sundry of the events of his
life and death. Every one of these we have found to be apocryphal.
In addition to these ineptly invoked "prophecies" there are many
other -- some one hundred and forty-nine -- jumbles of words
scattered through the Hebrew Scriptures which the pious Bible
editors, or the inspired Church, proclaim to be other "prophecies
of Jesus Christ" -- of like quality with the former.

The very first of these is that of the "curse" and the "Fall,"
with its pretended "promise of the Redeemer." How priest ever
proclaimed, and human intelligence ever believed, that a good and
loving Father God (as Yahveh is naively described), who said that
not a sparrow could fall without his anxious concern, would damn
throughout eternity the errant masterpieces of his creation, on the
very first day of their existence, for a simple disobedience, and
involve all creation and all future humanity in a deadly curse on
the soul of man until his Son should come, perhaps, four thousand
years later, to "redeem" this humanity from the damnation of
"original sin," and then leave damned or redamn all those who would
not believe the "Word of God" about it, or who never heard of it
and so never had a chance to disbelieve it -- this I leave to more
knowing or more credulous minds to try to explain. I simply read
the texts of the "Word of God" where this is all said by the
priests to be revealed, to discover whether an unprejudiced lay
mind can see it as they do.


Chapter iii of Genesis begins with the talking snake, who is
praised as being more subtitle than any beast of the field which
Yahveh had made. The serpent meets, for the first time, Mother Eve
under the shade of the wondrous tree of knowledge which flourished
in the midst of the Garden of Eden, with respect to which Yahveh,
in the first lie on record, had benignly threatened: "In the day
that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." The serpent tells
Eve that this is really not a true statement, for the fruit of the
tree was good to eat, and if eaten, "your eyes shall be opened, and
ye shall be as the gods, knowing good from evil." Here again the
verity of a plurality of gods is asserted.

This was Eve's first day on earth; she was totally
inexperienced with the ways of the world or of serpents; so she was
"beguiled" by the serpent and did eat of the fruit, and gave some
to Adam. While the trio were yet together, but too late to do any
good by prevention, Yahveh appears upon the scene, learns of the
incident, flies into the most damning of all the rages recorded of
him in all his Book of Curses, and immediately damns every person
and thing in being and yet to come.


This "curse" is a triple-plated damnation -- against the
serpent, against the woman, and against the man. It is well worth
the while to pause a moment to dissect it, curse by curse, as set
out in Genesis iii:

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201



"Yahveh Elohim said unto the serpent; Because thou hast done
"[1] thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast
of the field;
"[2] upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all
the days of thy life:
"[3] And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and
between thy seed and her seed;
"[4] it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his
heel." (Gen. iii, 14) 15)

While this is quite a blustering curse, it seems of slight
practical consequence -- though the Bible editors and the inspired
Church assure us that this really and truly is a pellucid and
positive divine promise of Jesus Christ. As the serpent naturally
went on his belly anyhow, one may wonder where is the point in
cursing him to continue to "wriggle in and wriggle out" as usual;
and as to eating dust for a steady diet, this must be a mistake, if
the "curse" applied to snakes generally, as the "Funny-mentalists"
insist, for snakes are not known to eat dirt, but they suck eggs,
and eat birds and rabbits and rats and other snakes; not even
Barnum's circus at its heyday ever had a snake addicted to such
unusual and economical diet as dirt.

This dust diet is really prescribed only to this particular
serpent; and there seems no just reason to read into the plain
language of Yahveh the curse of a perpetual dirt diet for all
snakes for all time, which is not in effect anyhow; and it would
hardly be just in Yahveh to condemn all snakes in the world for the
wrong of one snake. "Shall not the judge of all the earth be just?"
And should the "just suffer for the unjust?" We shall consider the
words "enmity between thee and the woman" and "thy seed" when we
have noticed the other curses in their order.


"Unto the woman be said,

"[1] I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;
"[2] in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children;
"[3] and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule
over thee." (Gen. iii, 16)

Here the choleric Yahveh simply inflicts poor Eve in her own
single person with increased pangs in child-birth and a
multiplication of sorrows, which would do no credit to any kind and
loving God. As for the rest, a desire or love only to her own
husband, instead of her running off after affinities and soul-
mates, would seem to be a blessing rather than a curse; and the
subjection to her husband as the head of the household, is no
accursed thing within reasonable limits of equality of personal

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


This curse on woman was also evidently limited to Eve alone;
and there is no justice or reason in claiming, as some expositors
insist, that Yahveh cursed all women for the simple act of one
woman, any more than he did all serpents. The whole curse against
Eve was really pain and sorrow in giving life, not eternal
damnation after death.


"'Unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the
voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded
thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it:

"[1] cursed is the ground for thy sake;
"[2] in sorrow shalt thou eat (of) it all the days of thy
"[3] Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee;
"[4) and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
"[5) In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou
return unto the ground;

"for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto
dust shalt thou return." (Gen. iii, 17-19).

This was Adam's share in the tremendous curse; and just what
was it? Let me state its terms again: 1. The ground is accursed; 2.
in sorrow shalt thou (Adam) eat it all the days of thy life (though
he was to die on the very day he ate it); 3. thorns and thistles
shall grow from the ground; 4. thou shalt eat the herbs of the
field; 5. thou shalt eat bread in the sweat of thy face until thou
return unto the ground; that is, until thy death.

This is every single solitary item of the fearful "curse on
man." it is no curse upon adam (man) at all, except the one item of
having to work for an honest living; all the rest of the "curse" is
upon the harmless and helpless earth, which Yahveh had just created
with such a deal of pains that be had to rest a whole day -- which
with him is as a thousand years (2 Peter iii, 8). But there is not
a single word or remotest hint of sin, or death of soul, or eternal
damnation. If Yahveh ever said: "In the day that thou eatest
thereof thou shalt surely die" (ii, 17) he either "repented" as
usual, or it was all a brutal Jahvic bluff; for Adam continued to
live, after that fatal day, for just nine hundred and thirty years,
if the vital statistics of Genesis are to be credited. But I repeat
that there is not one word in the whole record of sin or death or
damnation as a penalty against Adam himself, much less against his
posterity and all humanity.


The "curse," as we have seen, is principally against the
ground itself, not upon the man: "accursed is the ground for thy
sake." The man is humorously condemned to eat ground, as was the
snake; there is no "of" in the original Hebrew. The ground also
should grow thorns and thistles; yet, according to Genesis i, every
kind of herb and plant and tree, including, of course, thorns and
thistles, had already been created and "the earth brought forth"

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


the same, on the third day (i, 12). The man was further condemned,
as part of the "curse," to eat "the herb of the field"; but
already, and as a divine providence for man, these same herbs of
the field had been graciously bestowed upon him for food; for it is
recorded: "And Elohim said, Behold, I have given you every herb,
and every tree, in the which is the fruit; ... to you it shall be
for meat" (i, 29). As for eating bread in the sweat of his face, or
working to make the ground bring forth its produce of food, why,
that was the express purpose for which man was created in the first
place (in the second version of his creation) and put into the
Garden of Eden -- a blessing of healthful work instead of idle
existence. For, after the earth was created, and before man was put
upon it, it is recorded: "And there was not a man to till the
ground" (ii, 5). So Yahveh proceeded to form man out of the dust of
the ground, and then laid out and planted the Garden of Eden. Then
Yahveh Elohim took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden "to
dress it and to keep it" (ii, 15) -- thus providing for him useful
and healthful work, so that "by the sweat of his face" he should
eat of all the varied products of nature which Yahveh had given the
man for food, until his return to the dust from which he was taken.

So we see that every single clause of the "curse" on man, was
no "curse)? at all; every item of it, except that of "eating dirt"
all his life like the snake, and which he never acquired the habit
of doing, was already provided by the bounteous Creator Yahveh as
particular blessings for his masterpiece of creation. The statement
about his death and return to dust was no part of the "curse" at
all, for man was never designed to live on earth forever, but was
mercifully to be released, in due time, from that intolerable fate.
The pretence of some pious persons and of the Council of Orange
that gut for this awful "original sin," man would have lived always
without tasting death, besides being utterly absurd, is distinctly
denied by the inspired record; for, in a very curious passage,
Yahveh Elohim is represented in a colloquy with some of the other
gods, anonymous in the record, and, says Yahveh: "Behold, the man
is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put
forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and
live for ever: Therefore Yahveh Elohim sent him forth from the
garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken" (iii,
22, 23). Thus the man was driven away from the tree of life, which
had the magic property of making earthly life everlasting,
expressly to prevent him from acquiring immunity from death.

And he was driven forth from the garden expressly "to till the
ground from whence he was taken" (iii, 23) -- which was exactly the
purpose for which he was originally put into the garden, "to dress
it and to keep it" (ii, 15). So the "curse" is seen to be quite
innocuous; and I pledge my word of honor that there is not another
word nor the remotest allusion in all the Hebrew Bible to the whole
incident of the garden and the snake. The Old Testament is as
silent as Sheol (the grave) about any pretended "original sin" and
"curse" and "Fall," and of eternal damnation on account of that or
of anything else.

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201



And just here one very singular circumstance may be mentioned,
which is another falsehood imputable to Yahveh. Just after the
Flood, when pious reckless old Noah destroyed one-half of all his
breeding stock for a burnt sacrifice to Yahveh, we are told that
"Yahveh smelled a sweet savor; and Yahveh said in his heart, I will
not again curse the ground any more for man's sake" (Gen. viii,
21). This would certainly seem to indicate that Yahveh was appeased
and the "curse" lifted, and that the new race of mankind would now
have a fair new start in life. But this is evidently a mistake; for
the "curse" of Eden yet rests upon the ground. Indeed, "all things
continue as from the beginning of the world"; the ground still
brings forth thorns and thistles, and in toil man still eats of it
in the sweat of his face (for, as the poet sings: "How salt with
sweat is the laborer's bread!"); snakes still wriggle through life
on their belly; and in pain do women yet bring forth children. So
Jahvistic injustice is still universal and his Holy Word is broken,
believe either phase of it one may prefer.

This is the whole of the fearful "curse" and "fall of man,"
whereby, we are told, all humanity was placed under the "curse of
God," and Jesus Christ had to be sent into the world by his Father
Yahveh, after four thousand years of weary "watchful waiting," to
suffer and die ignominiously in order "to redeem mankind from the
sin and curse of Adam." But one may wonder where is any eternal
death and damnation in all this, or any scheme of redemption --
where is the joke. I shall reveal it.


Utterly all of the "plan of salvation" is revealed, or
concealed, in one fatal verse of Genesis iii. The whole trick is in
the riddle of Yahveh and his talking snake: "I will put enmity
between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it
shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel" (iii, 15).
Yahveh Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, in his infinite wisdom,
said those few cabalistic words about snake- and woman-seed, and
about bruising heads and heels, to his talking snake; and out of
this inspired sentence the inspired oracles of the new
dispensation, over four thousand years afterwards, conjured this
fearful and wonderful combination of curse and prophecy, clear as
mud: Mankind is damned through the sin of Adam to the last
generation; but the merciful and loving Yahveh will send his son
Jesus Christ, the Lord knows when, to "redeem and save" all those
who believe this childish Jewish fable, and to re-damn in hell
fire, not then invented, all those who do not and will not believe
a word of it.

Of course, Yahveh did not say this in words that anybody but
a talking snake or a priest could understand. The mystic remark was
made to the serpent; it does not appear that Adam and Eve heard it
or understood it to mean anything, and certainly not the tremendous
curse of death, damnation, and salvation, four thousand years
afterwards evolved out of it.

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


Nor did a single patriarch, priest, prophet, or seer of
Israel, with all their frenzied visions and fiery cursings, ever
imagine or mention anything of the sort. Of all persons on earth,
these Old Testament worthies surely would not have overlooked so
momentous and terrific a curse, in the very beginning of their own
Book of Curses, if either by inspiration or ingenuity they could
have unriddled such a sense out of these seemingly senseless words.
Those holy ones of Israel surpassed all human skill of those ages
in devising curses to terrify the Chosen People into abject
submission to the priests and to Yahveh; but, fearfully effective
as it was afterwards made, not a word of the awful ((curse of
Adam," with eternal hell fire and damnation, do they utter, or even
hint, or suspect.


Moses is Yahveh's arch-terrorist; he piles Pelion on Ossa of
threats and curses throughout all of his reputed Five Books, and
sums them all up in his schedule of curses in the closing chapters
of Deuteronomy. He elaborates the most frightful and blood-curdling
catalogue of curses ever framed or imagined prior to the gentle and
loving Jesus and his apostles and to medieval churchly anathemas.
All which he threatens "shall come to pass if thou wilt not hearken
unto the voice of Yahveh thy God, to observe to do all his
commandments; ... all these curses shall come upon thee, and
overtake thee." Cursed shalt thou be in this and cursed shalt thou
be in that:

"Yahveh shall send upon thee cursing, vexation, and rebuke,
... until thou be destroyed. ... Yahveh shall make the pestilence
cleave unto thee, until he have consumed thee from off the land.
... Yahveh shall smite thee with a consumption, and with a fever,
and with an inflammation, and with an extreme burning, and with the
sword, and with blasting, and with mildew. ... And thou shalt eat
the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy
daughters" -- and countless other blood-curdling and diabolic
horrors. And when old Moses has exhausted his powers of invention
of terrors and his vocabulary of horrors, and is choked off by an
apoplectic fit of rage, he sputters and spits forth a residuary
clause of curses: "Also every sickness, and every plague, which is
not written in the book of this law, them will Yahveh bring upon
thee, until thou be destroyed" (Deut. xxviii, 15-61).

These gentle admonitions to belief and obedience, be it
remembered, are by Moses himself -- the same inspired author of the
riddle of the serpent seed, supposed by Christian propagandists to
signify eternal damnation in hell fire. Read in the light of hell
fire, this "curse of Adam" would have been the most potent of all
the terrors of the priests of Yahveh, just as it always has been,
until lately, of those of the later triplex Deity. Moses imposed
the yoke of the priest upon the people by the threat of death: "The
man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto [obey]
the priest. ... even that man shall die" (Deut. xvii, 12); and he
exhausts the vocabulary of terrorism to instill the abject fear of
the hierarchy into the minds and souls of the deluded Chosen: but
never once does he hurl at them: "Doubt and be damned" -- "Fear him
who hath power to destroy both soul and body in hell!" What a
chance be missed!

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


But Moses, in all his fluency of frightfulness and fury of
invention of terror, never once includes the "curse of Adam" in the
catalogue of "all the curses that are written in this book"; he
evidently did not read his own riddle that way; and no other priest
or prophet from Moses to Malachi even hints at Adam's curse, or
Fall, or eternal damnation in hell fire. Hell and its fire are
totally non-existent in the entire Hebrew scheme of penalties and

Again, let it be noted in the reader's mind, and written
indelibly upon his memory, that from the first "curse" in Genesis
iii until the final "Lest he come and smite the earth with a curse"
in the last verse of Malachi" amid all the fearful cursings and
ravings of the prophets of Yahveh calling down death and
destruction upon his Chosen People, there is not one single mention
or remotest reference again in all the Hebrew Bible to the snake
story, or to the curse of Adam, or to the "fall of man," or to the
necessity or propriety of redemption from "original sin" and from
the fires of hell. All the furies of the dread Yahveh, invoked by
all his holy prophets, are temporal terrors; all his pains and
penalties are ended with the death of his miserable victims. In the
grave (sheol) they are at rest; they are never pursued into any
hell fire on account of Adam's sin or of their own. We must give
even their Yahveh his due.


Whence then, comes this fearful doctrine of "original sin," of
the "fall of man," of eternal death and damnation -- of this
curious and accursed "plan of salvation?" It is all a fiendish
invention of the apostles and priests of the new dispensation, as
will now be very easily seen. Hell fire and damnation are simply
the genial sanction of the religion of the gentle and loving Jesus.
But Jesus Christ never once even mentioned Adam or the pretended
curse and the Fall; he never once intimated that his mission was
due to the pretended talking snake scene in the Garden of Eden.
More than that, not one of the four writers of the so-called
gospels utters a word about Adam, or the curse, or the Fall, or of
"redemption" by Jesus Christ for any sin of Adam, which is never
even remotely referred to throughout their gospels. The single
reference by the gospel writers to any Mosaic antecedent for any of
the events of the life of Jesus Christ (except some pretended
"prophecies" elsewhere examined) is by John, "the disciple whom
Jesus loved," his dearest and closest friend; and he only says: "As
Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son
of man be lifted up" (John iii, 14). But this is not because of the
serpent in Eden, or of the "curse" on Adam and mankind, but simply,
as John says, "that whosoever believeth in him should not perish,
but have eternal life." Thus neither Jesus nor any of his inspired
biographers makes the remotest allusion to the very cornerstone of
the "plan of salvation."


The awful dogma was inflicted upon suffering superstitious
humanity by one who never knew Jesus; who was the most malignant of
the early persecutors of the believers in Jesus; one Saul of

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


Tarsus, a Jew, a Pharisee, a doctrinaire, a garrulous,
tergiversating zealot, who admits that he "profited in the Jews'
religion above many" (Gal. i, 14); then changed his name to Paul,
and with the zeal of a new convert became perfectly frenzied as a
propagandist of the new religion -- admittedly "lying to the glory
of God" -- to such an extent that he came to be called "the second
founder of Christianity," the creator of its dogma, and deviser of
its dogmatic system, self-contradictory in most or all of its
muddled propositions.

This Paul in a fit of frenzy gives vent to this: "I knew a man
in Christ above fourteen years ago (whether in the body, I cannot
tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth [but
certainly out of the mind]; such an one caught up to the third
heaven; ... and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for
a man to utter" (2 Cor. xii, 2). Notwithstanding this pretended
trip to the very fount of inspiration, Paul is so uninspired by
truth that he takes the prophets of old seriously, and assures us
that "God ... at sundry times and in divers manners [i.e., by
dreams, dice, and phallic ephods] spake in time past unto the
fathers by the prophets" (Heb. i, 1) -- heedless that this same God
himself had said: "The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent
them not" (Jer. xiv, 14).

The grossness of his superstition and the proof that nothing
he utters is to be believed as very "oracles of God" lie not only
in his incessant contradictions of himself, but also in his own
boasting confession before Felix: "But this I confess unto thee,
that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of
my fathers [Yahveh], believing all things which are written in the
law and in the prophets" (Acts xxiv, 14). We have just seen the
portraiture of this Yahveh, "God of my fathers," and heard the
maudlin "ravings" and monstrous lies of the meshuggah prophets, of
whom Paul's old side-partner and rival Peter fatuously says:
"Prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of
God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" (2 Pet. i, 21). But
these "holy men of Yahveh" have abundantly admitted the sources of
their "inspiration," and are totally discredited.

Now it is that this Paul inflicts his cruel and accursed
"original sin" on humanity. If he had been inspired of truth by
God, be would have known that Adam, Eve, the Garden of Eden, the
talking snake, the "curse," Moses, and his Genesis, all were myths
and fables. But he had been whisked into the third heaven, wherever
that is, and this may have been one of the things he heard "which
it is not lawful for a man to utter" -- at least, for an honest and
truthful man; the chief advance agent of "revelation" deemed it
unlawful to reveal things which he saw in heaven with his own eyes,
and instead peddled ancient and false "prophecies" of the old
meshuggahs of Israel. When he comes back to earth (but not to his
senses), he maunders through some pages of myth and wrath of God
and blood, and delivers himself of the solemn, oracular, and
gratuitous utterances on his novel propositions of "original sin"
and the "plan of salvation."

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201



The whole of theology, founded on these fables of dogma, is
aptly summed up in those memorable opening words of Milton's
immortal epic:

"Of man's first disobedience and the fruit
Of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste
Brought death into the world and all our woe,
With loss of Eden, till one greater Man
Restore us and regain that blissful seat,
Sing, heav'nly Muse."

But truly inspired of poesy as was Milton, let us turn to yet
higher inspiration for the more authoritative theory of original
sin and for the inspired originals of the plan of salvation. The
great dogmatist of the faith, Paul, thus states and restates his
doctrine, of which he is the originator:

"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be
made alive." (i Cor. xv, 22)

This theorem he elaborates at great length and with much
iteration in others of his letters, of which this is a fair

"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and
death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, ... even over
them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's
transgression. ... Through the offence of one many be dead.
For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by
the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." (Romans V,
12-15, 19)

And to cap his direful dogma, he emits this positive

"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law." (Gal. iii, 13)

Human language is inadequate for comment on the fearful
fatality of these fatuous sentences. The fairest part of the earth
has been under their blight for nearly twenty centuries; at this
time and place it suffices to demonstrate their awful enormity of

A childish fable of a talking snake and a muddled "curse,"
about as pregnant of the sense of "original sin" and eternal
damnation as "chops and tomato sauce" are of breach of promise of
marriage, are warped and twisted and tortured by the adroit
Sergeant Buzfuz of Christianity into the priestly doctrine of
eternal damnation in hell fire for all humanity! As there never was
any Adam, it cannot be true that "in Adam all die"; therefore its
corollary that "even so in Christ shall all be made alive" cannot
follow. As it consequently is not true that "by one man sin entered
into the world, and death by sin," the superstition of "original
sin" is false, as it is likewise false that "so death passed upon
all men," in the sense of the soul's "death by sin" of Adam
inflicted upon all succeeding generations by a "curse."

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


From this fatuous torturing of an idle fable, purely personal
and temporal in its every fanciful term, comes the monstrous
cardinal tenet of the Christian Church, that a great and glorious
God damned all the countless millions of yet unborn humanity to
eternal hell fire because one man in a fable ate a fabled apple at
the instigation of a fabled talking snake, and for punishment was
told that he must work for his living thereafter, and that "in the
day that thou eatest thereof thou shall surely die" -- which he
leisurely enough is said to have done just 930 years after the
fatal incident.

Based on this inspired story and on the amazing deductions
from it by the inspired Doctor of Dogma, Paul, is the inspired
doctrine thus formulated by the original one true Church of Yahveh,
and fondly adopted by every sect in Christendom, however otherwise
dissentient, as the very cornerstone of the ecclesiastical plan of

"The souls of those who depart in mortal sin, or only in
original sin, go down immediately to hell" (Second Council of
Lyons; and Decree Unionis, Council of Florence; Cath. Encyc.,
Vol. VII, p. 208).

The climax of this deadly doctrine is found in the awesome
aphorism of sundry of the Christian creeds that "Hell is full of
infants a span long," roasting in the torments of everlasting hell
fire because of the "original sin" of Father Adam, who never lived,
in a Garden of Eden that never was.


The culminating doctrine of the whole series, perfectly
typical of untruth of it all, is Paul's astonishing assertion:
"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse" (Gal. iii, 13). Let us
apply a moment's thought to this dogma of Paul and the priests.

According to the infamy imputed to Yahveh, he damned all
future humanity into hell for the sin of the fabled first man.
Awful, if true; all babes, however innocent; all men and women,
however nobly good and virtuous in life -- all damned in hell
irretrievably because of One; for "in Adam all men die" (1 Cor. xv,
22), "and so death passed upon all men" (Rom. v, 12).

But after four thousand years Yahveh, who had done this,
relenting, sent his "only begotten Son" to die and so save the
world from this curse. Christ died that all might live; he redeemed
us from the curse. This is just and righteous, however tardy, if
true. As all were damned, whether they knew it or not, whether they
believed it or not, whether they had sinned or not, surely, in
righting the wrong, all should be saved quite as universally and

But no; the Christian plan of salvation does not work that
way. Its terms and conditions are: "Believe, and ye shall be saved;
believe not, and ye are damned already" (Mark xvi, 16; John iii,
18). Damned nolens volens: undamned only volens and credulous. Be
born and be damned; believe unbelievable things and be saved, or
remain damned: such is the "sacred science of Christianity."

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


Of course, if the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ is given
full credit, its efficacy is, must be, universal. He was proclaimed
from heaven: "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of
the world" (John i, 29); and Inspiration explicitly states: "And he
is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our's only, but also
for the sins of the whole world" (I John ii, 2). Therefore, by
every token of truth and reason, if the sacrifice of the cross
really "redeemed us from the curse" as universally as Adam's
reputed sin damned, then all are saved by that atoning act alone.
But there would be then no use for priest and church and theology;
and threats of hell fire would be as innocuous as water on the
proverbial goose's back. So the zealous soul-savers, inventors and
propagandists of hell fire, have "made the sacrifice of Christ of
no avail," by limiting its effective redemption strictly to the
microscopic minority of true believers alone, leaving the countless
majority of mankind yet damned forever. Indeed, millions who
cherish the heretic hope of salvation are doomed to infernal
disappointment and eternal damnation for their unorthodox way of
belief; for the venerable Athanasian Creed of the One True Church
assures us: "Whoever will be saved, it is necessary above all
things that he hold to the Catholic faith. Unless each one keep
this whole and unbroken, he shall without doubt perish into eternal
death. ... This is the Catholic faith: unless each believe it
rightly and firmly, he cannot be saved" (Cath. Encyc., Vol. II, p.


There are yet other curiosities of the plan of salvation -- of
this "redemption" from the "curse" -- even for the true believers.
If by the sacrifice of the cross the "curse" is taken away, even if
only for those who believe, then why not all the curse? Why is the
wondrous work of redemption so incomplete? The snake still goes
pronely upon his belly, under the curse; the believing woman still
brings forth her still damned child in birth pains, under the
curse; the yet accursed ground yet brings forth thorns and
thistles, under the curse, and yields its fruits, even to the true
believer, only by dint of "the sweat of his face," under the curse;
even the true believer yet eats his bread in the sweat of his face
-- all exactly as pronounced in the "curse" from which his Christ
"redeemed" him two thousand years ago. Surely "the wisdom of Yahveh
is foolishness to men." And all this wisdom is the legitimate fruit
of the tree of knowledge in the Garden of Eden. Such is the Sacred
Science of Christianity.

The whole fabric of the Christian "faith" -- and not its
admirable moral precepts, which are not new or peculiar to it at
all, but its laboriously built up dogmatic theology, forged by Paul
and his associate propagandists into a priestly system of beliefs
and practices enforced by terrific threats of eternal damnation
hereafter through eternity -- and so long as was possible by
torture and death here on earth -- is seen to be totally dependent,
as it was falsely founded, upon the idle fables of Yahveh of the
primitive, superstitious, heathen Hebrews, and falls into vacuous
nothingness with the disproof of the fabled Eden and the Fall.

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201


Thus we see that the whole of the Christian faith, the entire
Christian plan of salvation, -- the sole and only apology for
Christian theology -- hangs like a Dead Sea apple from the fabled
serpent-entwined tree of knowledge in the mythical Garden of Eden.
And, like the Dead Sea apple, the "sacred science of Christianity,"
with its labored "plan of salvation," turns to vain ashes at the
touch of truth and is blown away with a breath of reason.

Paul admits: "Beyond measure I persecuted the church of God,
and wasted it" (Gal. i, 13), and he admits that he found his profit
in the bloody business (i, 14). When he saw the "great light" on
Damascus way, and took up the new faith, be became a much more
bigoted persecutor of all unbelievers in his labored, ludicrous
dogmas. He screams: "If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let
him be Anathema, Maran-atha" (1 Cor. xvi, 22) -- a frightful
churchly curse; "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than
that we have preached, let him be accursed"; and he pledges eternal
hell fire to the skeptically inclined: "He that doubteth is damned"
(Rom. xiv, 23) -- "suffering the vengeance of eternal fire" (Jude
7). This is the nearest that ecclesiastical terrorism could get to
inflicting torture and death upon disbelievers while the mighty
Roman Empire stood guarding of human rights; the rack and the stake
for unbelief came later, when the debased and christianized state
had entered into a priest-imposed league of hell and covenant of
death with the Holy Church, which Paul and his arch-adjutant Peter
had created and established "Ad majorem Dei gloriam" and for their
mutual profit and aggrandizement and that of the whole apostolic
succession and even of dissenting Protestants ever since.

Jesus Christ founded the Church with a play on words, a pun:
"Thou art Peter [Greek, Petros, a stone], and upon this rock I will
build my church" -- and the assurance is fondly added: "and the
gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. xvi, 18). Hell
and the church are thus cut from the same piece by the Grand Master
of both superstitions. The hell myth has long since been exploded,
and the church was badly shaken by the explosion. When the keystone
of the arch, ecclesiastic theology, is knocked out, the whole
structure of superstition will crash down to ruin, "and great will
be the fall thereof", to the universal advantage of true spiritual
uplook and the brotherhood of man on earth,

****     ****

Reproducible Electronic Publishing can defeat censorship.

****     ****

Joseph Wheless


Bank of Wisdom
Box 926, Louisville, KY 40201

Bank of Wisdom

The Bank of Wisdom is run by Emmett Fields out of his home in Kentucky. He painstakingly scanned in these works and put them on disks for others to have available. Mr. Fields makes these disks available for only the cost of the media.

Files made available from the Bank of Wisdom may be freely reproduced and given away, but may not be sold.

Reproducible Electronic Publishing can defeat censorship.

Bank of WisdomThe Bank of Wisdom is a collection of the most thoughtful, scholarly and factual books. These computer books are reprints of suppressed books and will cover American and world history; the Biographies and writings of famous persons, and especially of our nations Founding Fathers. They will include philosophy and religion. all these subjects, and more, will be made available to the public in electronic form, easily copied and distributed, so that America can again become what its Founders intended --

The Free Market-Place of Ideas.

The Bank of Wisdom is always looking for more of these old, hidden, suppressed and forgotten books that contain needed facts and information for today. If you have such books please contact us, we need to give them back to America.

Bank of Wisdom
Box 926
Louisville, KY 40201