On Cross-Cultural and Historical Near-Death Experiences: A Secular Historian of Religions Answers a Critic
In this article Gregory Shushan responds to Keith Augustine's characterization of his recent article "Diversity and Similarity of Near-Death Experiences across Cultures and History: Implications for the Survival Hypothesis." Addressing Augustine's misconceptions of his theoretical, methodological, and disciplinary positioning, Shushan clarifies that he is a secular historian of religions who examines NDEs through cultural, historical, and ritual lenses. He reiterates that far from advocating a survivalist interpretation of the phenomenon, his article shows how the historical and cross-cultural accounts present distinct analytical challenges to both materialist and survivalist hypotheses. Shushan reaffirms his commitment to interpretive neutrality, emphasizing that the historical study of NDEs remains entirely independent of their underlying ontological status.



