You can dismiss the support request pop up for 4 weeks (28 days) if you want to be reminded again. Or you can dismiss until our next donations drive (typically at the beginning of October). Before you dismiss, please consider making a donation. Thanks!
One Time
$5/month (US)
$10/month (US)
Support II via AmazonSmile Internet Infidels Needs Your Support!
dismiss for   28 days   1 year   info
2017 Internet Infidels Fundraising Drive / $32,582.64 of $40,000.00
Support Us! By providing information which is nearly impossible to find elsewhere, the Secular Web has sought to level the playing field by offering arguments and evidence challenging supernatural beliefs. In an ocean of religious confusion, help us maintain a drop of sanity!
81.46%
 

Science, Confirmation, and the Theistic Hypothesis (1986)

Keith M. Parsons

 

Abstract

Introduction

Chapter One. Creationism: The Theistic Hypothesis as Pseudoscience

The first chapter argues that theism is inevitably reduced to pseudoscience if it is placed in direct competition with scientific theories. This is illustrated by the example of the "scientific" creationists, who attempt to support theism by placing it in opposition to evolutionary theory. It is argued, contrary to the claims of some recent philosophers of science, that a clear distinction can be drawn between science and pseudoscience. Demarcation criteria are developed and employed to show why theism cannot be a strictly scientific hypothesis.

Chapter Two. Schlesinger on the Confirmation of Theism

The second chapter examines the attempts of George Schlesinger to produce inductive reformulations of traditional theistic arguments. His attempt to apply confirmation theory in support of the theistic hypothesis are presented and criticized.

Chapter Three. Swinburne and the Inductive Cosmological Argument

The third chapter examines the attempts of Richard Swinburne to produce inductive reformulations of traditional theistic arguments. His attempt to apply confirmation theory in support of the theistic hypothesis are presented and criticized. It is concluded that the principles of confirmation theory are very unlikely to land much support to the theistic hypothesis.

Chapter Four. Miracles, Confirmation, and Apologetics

The fourth chapter examines a number of arguments against the miraculous. It is argued that, though it is very unlikely that miracles could receive confirmation sufficient to convince skeptics, no cogent anti-theistic argument can be based on a critique of the miraculous.

Chapter Five. Evil and the Disconfirmation of Theism

The final chapter develops an hypothesis-disconfirming version of the problem of evil. It is shown how evil serves as a counterexample to the theistic hypothesis and how two recent attempts to produce adequate theodicies fail.

Conclusion

The thesis concludes with some reflections on the consequences of theism and naturalism.

Bibliography


Top