Home » Library » Historical Library » Christianity and Agnosticism

Historical Library Disclaimer

The Historical Library contains writings written before 1970, only. For material written during or after 1970, please refer to the Modern Documents section of the Secular Web Library.

This Historical Library is provided for those doing research into the history of nontheism. It is not intended to be--and should not be used as--a source of modern, up-to-date information regarding atheistic issues. Those looking for modern critiques of theism should go to the Modern Documents section of the Secular Web Library.

All of the Historical Library authors are dead--and in many cases have been so for several decades. We will not reply to email addressed to dead authors, and therefore any email addressed to these authors will be ignored. Similarly, we do not reply to feedback regarding faulty scholarship on the part of dead authors, nor do we correct spelling errors and/or typographical errors (most of which result from the scanning and OCR process) in their articles.

Christianity and Agnosticism


A Controversy

Consisting of Papers By:

Henry Wace, D.D.;

Prof. Thomas H. Huxley;

The Bishop of Peterborough;

W. H. Mallock; and

Mrs. Humphry Ward.

NEW YORK

D. APPLETON AND COMPANY

1889


The undisputed interest taken in the recent controversy between the Rev. Dr. Henry Wace, Principal of King’s College, London, and Prof. Huxley, over the question of the true significance of agnosticism, and incidentally of the limits of natural knowledge; and the difficulty of getting at the complete discussion when scattered thorough different publications, have induced the publishers to bring the articles together in a single volume.

The opening paper, which led directly to those that follow, was read at the Church Congress in Manchester in 1888. The paper on “The Value of Witness to the Miraculous,” though not strictly a part of the controversy, was published by Prof. Huxley while it was going on, and its direct bearing on the question at issue is a sufficient reason for its insertion. Mr. Mallock’s paper on “Cowardly Agnosticism,” and also that of Mrs. Humphry Ward, to which Dr. Wace makes reply in his second article, are included for the valuable side-lights they throw upon the general subject under discussion.


Note:* In this computerized version of this work all footnotes will follow immediately after the paragraph containing the asterisk (*) and not at the bottom of the page as in the printed volumes. These notes will be between lines at the top and bottom (the same as this note) and we suggest these notes be skipped over when reading for general information. This is necessary to prevent the notes from being misplaced in the various electronic formats this work will be transfered into.


I. On Agnosticism.

By Henry Wace, D.D., Prebendary of St. Paul’s Cathedral; Principal of King’s College, London

( Read at the Manchester Church Congress, 1888.)

II. Agnosticism.

By Prof. Thomas H. Huxley

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” February, 1889.)

III. Agnosticism. A Reply to Prof. Huxley.

By Henry Wace, D.D.

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” March, 1889.)

IV. Agnosticism.

By W. C. Magee, D.D., Bishop of Peterborough

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” March, 1889.)

V. Agnosticism: A Rejoinder.

By Prof. Thomas H. Huxley

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” April, 1889.)

VI. Christianity and Agnosticism.

By Henry Wace, D.D.

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” May, 1889.)

VII. An Explanation to Prof. Huxley.

By W. C. Magee, D.D., Bishop of Peterborough

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” May, 1889.)

VIII. The Value of Witness to the Miraculous.

By Prof. Thomas H. Huxley

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” March, 1889.)

IX. Agnosticism and Christianity.

By Prof. Thomas H. Huxley

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” June, 1889.)

X. “Cowardly Agnosticism.” A Word With Prof. Huxley.

By W. H. Mallock

( From “The Fortnightly Review,” April, 1889.)

XI. The New Reformation.

By Mrs. Humphry Ward

( From “The Nineteenth Century,” March, 1889.)